Portugal vs Ivory Coast Live here on 3-5 Fast Working Channels?
http://sports2all.com/football-live-streaming/ Match begans in 7 minutes.
FIFA World Cup(TM) - 2 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
Definitely on these sites, because every buddy knows that these are official sites for international soccer matches which give live streams. http://FIFAWorldCupEvents.com http://ESPN.livepcsports.com (Presented by ESPN for fifa world cup live stream) http://FIFAWorldCup.LivePcSports.com http://SkySports.LivePcSports.com http://LiveStream.livepcsports.com From Google, Ask, Bing Survey, Over 90% people in USA, Europe and Rest of World Will be watching FIFA World Cup Match LIVE Online on these sites
2 :
Enjoy Here Live Ivory Coast vs Portugal FIFA World CUP Match ; June 15, 2010 (11:30 GMT) http://slovakia-vs-newzealand-live.blogspot.com/ http://slovakia-vs-newzealand-live.blogspot.com/ http://slovakia-vs-newzealand-live.blogspot.com/ http://slovakia-vs-newzealand-live.blogspot.com/
Saturday, July 21, 2012
Saturday, July 14, 2012
At what age can you find a decent job in places such as LasVegas, America, London or Miami
At what age can you find a decent job in places such as LasVegas, America, London or Miami ?
Im South African but i live in portugal and my parents just want me to work for them but i refuse to, i need to go my own way and there are alot of family problems at home so i need to get out of here as soon as possible!
Miami - 1 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
I don't know about age but I can tell you that if you want to get a decent job in Miami you must know Spanish.
Im South African but i live in portugal and my parents just want me to work for them but i refuse to, i need to go my own way and there are alot of family problems at home so i need to get out of here as soon as possible!
Miami - 1 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
I don't know about age but I can tell you that if you want to get a decent job in Miami you must know Spanish.
Saturday, July 7, 2012
Why did Emanuel Pessagno succeeded in obtaining Portuguese service and Christopher Columbus didn't
Why did Emanuel Pessagno succeeded in obtaining Portuguese service and Christopher Columbus didn't?
If Italian sailors like Emmanual Pessagno and Lanzarote Malocello were accepted by the Portuguese and eventually worked for the kings of Portugal then why was Christopher Columbus dismissed by Portugal ?.
History - 1 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
Portugal was sailing all around the Atlantic since at least the 1420's... They knew it was a very big stretch to sail west to reach the Orient (and possibly they knew there was a huge land mass in the way, although without any gold or spices). And, of course, in 1488 Bartolomeu Dias discovered it was possible to sail around Africa to reach India and China, the precious Sea Route to the East was open and was 100% portuguese, there wasn't much need in finding out another route towards the west. But Columbus did sail for Portugal, from 1476 to 1485, he lived there, in the island of Porto Santo and married the daughter of one of Portugal's early explorers, Perestrello. And found out everything there was to know about sailing, charting and exploring in those years.
If Italian sailors like Emmanual Pessagno and Lanzarote Malocello were accepted by the Portuguese and eventually worked for the kings of Portugal then why was Christopher Columbus dismissed by Portugal ?.
History - 1 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
Portugal was sailing all around the Atlantic since at least the 1420's... They knew it was a very big stretch to sail west to reach the Orient (and possibly they knew there was a huge land mass in the way, although without any gold or spices). And, of course, in 1488 Bartolomeu Dias discovered it was possible to sail around Africa to reach India and China, the precious Sea Route to the East was open and was 100% portuguese, there wasn't much need in finding out another route towards the west. But Columbus did sail for Portugal, from 1476 to 1485, he lived there, in the island of Porto Santo and married the daughter of one of Portugal's early explorers, Perestrello. And found out everything there was to know about sailing, charting and exploring in those years.
Sunday, July 1, 2012
How come the US wont ADAPT and ADOPT successful strategies from OTHER countries
How come the US wont ADAPT and ADOPT successful strategies from OTHER countries?
Health care in Canada, drug reforms in Portugal etc...How come the US wont just take some other contries ideas and tweek them to make it work OUR citizens? I know the variables (difference of economy, natural resourses etc) But are we too dumb to COPY a little??? I thought this was a MELTING POT built on the foundation of DIFFERENT PEOPLE???
Government - 4 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
Conservatives. And the us has its head way up its ass to do that they are to "proud" its like the homeless guy who thinks hes an aristocrat. If they can stop being so afraid of change maybe the us will get somewhere new but naw they wont do that you know it. Us is to egocentric only worrying about being ontop
2 :
For any life-threatening condition Canadians with MONEY always flee Canada. That is of course WHY all Democrats demand their system be copied. As an example, had I been in Canada 31 August 2006 there is a 100% chance I would not have seen September 1st. I got the "only hope" procedure (by the way, no one asked about insurance/ability to pay until after) that's STILL ILLEGAL in Canada - for COST-effectiveness reasons. Even if I had cash pouring out of my pockets it CANNOT be done there. It's a CRIME to do it. Tell me. Why do you hate your children so much you want that system for them?
3 :
Because Americans value different things than citizens of other countries. They inherently do not trust their government and value personal and group freedoms. Their constitutions, laws, and republic is specifically designed to limit government powers, keep certain powers at the local (i.e. state) level, and to allow individuals and the free market to run things. In many areas that has worked extremely well for them. Now... you can argue that the Canadian health care is better, but if you look at exactly how the Canadian system works, you quickly realize that the American people simply aren't willing to give the government the kinds of powers it would need to implement such a system nor are they willing to give up certain basic 'freedoms' necessary to implement a system like that. Complete state take over of all hospitals. Complete state take over of all medical insurance. Direct state control of education systems -- forcing local school boards to accept PE, health, sex education, etc. standards. Limiting of medical lawsuits. State government control over medical schools. Federal laws on drug patents. State planning of all hospitals, medical equipment purchases, etc. State and federal control over which procedures are covered. Removal of employer health plans to be replaced by federal income tax hikes. Federal distribution of funds to states with penalties for those not meeting federal government standards. etc., etc. These aren't small changes. You'd need massive constitutional changes, government buy out hospitals, hundreds of law changes in each of the states, entire industries put out of business, etc. Ignoring personal interests of various groups (doctors, lawyers, wealthy, etc.) who won't benefit on this, the massive turn-over time and costs of trying to switch to such a system, legal challenges, etc. most Americans simply aren't willing to try such an exercises. And of course, without such wholesale changes it is highly unlikely that you would see any of the benefits of a single-payer health care system.
4 :
The US won't adapt, because it would be financially disastrous. Right now, health care reform would be too costly.
Health care in Canada, drug reforms in Portugal etc...How come the US wont just take some other contries ideas and tweek them to make it work OUR citizens? I know the variables (difference of economy, natural resourses etc) But are we too dumb to COPY a little??? I thought this was a MELTING POT built on the foundation of DIFFERENT PEOPLE???
Government - 4 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
Conservatives. And the us has its head way up its ass to do that they are to "proud" its like the homeless guy who thinks hes an aristocrat. If they can stop being so afraid of change maybe the us will get somewhere new but naw they wont do that you know it. Us is to egocentric only worrying about being ontop
2 :
For any life-threatening condition Canadians with MONEY always flee Canada. That is of course WHY all Democrats demand their system be copied. As an example, had I been in Canada 31 August 2006 there is a 100% chance I would not have seen September 1st. I got the "only hope" procedure (by the way, no one asked about insurance/ability to pay until after) that's STILL ILLEGAL in Canada - for COST-effectiveness reasons. Even if I had cash pouring out of my pockets it CANNOT be done there. It's a CRIME to do it. Tell me. Why do you hate your children so much you want that system for them?
3 :
Because Americans value different things than citizens of other countries. They inherently do not trust their government and value personal and group freedoms. Their constitutions, laws, and republic is specifically designed to limit government powers, keep certain powers at the local (i.e. state) level, and to allow individuals and the free market to run things. In many areas that has worked extremely well for them. Now... you can argue that the Canadian health care is better, but if you look at exactly how the Canadian system works, you quickly realize that the American people simply aren't willing to give the government the kinds of powers it would need to implement such a system nor are they willing to give up certain basic 'freedoms' necessary to implement a system like that. Complete state take over of all hospitals. Complete state take over of all medical insurance. Direct state control of education systems -- forcing local school boards to accept PE, health, sex education, etc. standards. Limiting of medical lawsuits. State government control over medical schools. Federal laws on drug patents. State planning of all hospitals, medical equipment purchases, etc. State and federal control over which procedures are covered. Removal of employer health plans to be replaced by federal income tax hikes. Federal distribution of funds to states with penalties for those not meeting federal government standards. etc., etc. These aren't small changes. You'd need massive constitutional changes, government buy out hospitals, hundreds of law changes in each of the states, entire industries put out of business, etc. Ignoring personal interests of various groups (doctors, lawyers, wealthy, etc.) who won't benefit on this, the massive turn-over time and costs of trying to switch to such a system, legal challenges, etc. most Americans simply aren't willing to try such an exercises. And of course, without such wholesale changes it is highly unlikely that you would see any of the benefits of a single-payer health care system.
4 :
The US won't adapt, because it would be financially disastrous. Right now, health care reform would be too costly.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)